|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
THE
ARCP PROJECT BACKGROUND |
| |
|
During
the Asian Development Bank programming Mission in November
1996, the Governement of the Philippines requested the banks
to provide technical assistance (TA) to the Department of
Agrarian Reform (DAR) for the formulation of a project that
would support the implementation of the Comprehensive Agrarian
Reform Program (CARP). This support is needed to execute
the department thrust of developing the Agrarian Reform
Communities (ARCs) into a self-sustaining and self-reliant
community for alleviation of lives in the countryside. In
response to the Government's request, the Bank approved
the TA in March 1997 & subsequently a TA study was completed
in August 1997. The Bank dispatched a loan Fact-Finding
Mission in September in 1997, and a Preappraisal Mission
in February 1998. Appraisal of the Project took place in
October 1998. During the subsequent Bank mission, extensive
consultation took place with Government agencies, the Agrarian
Reform Beneficiaries (ARBs), people's organizations (POs),
nongovernment organizations (NGOs), other funding agencies,
and the local government units (LGUs).
|
| |
 |
| |
|
 |
|
|
|
The project addressed the key constraints to living conditions and
income enhancement of the beneficiaries and their communities through
a process of participatory needs assessment at the barangay level.
The project concept emphasizes a demand-driven approach, local governance,
and commitment from and ownership by beneficiaries. This requires
a high degree of participation by beneficiaries and their community
for identification, planning, implementation, monitoring and evaluation
(M&E), and maintenance
of Project interventions. Most of the proposed activities are devolved
to the LGUs,and equity participation by stakeholders (POs, ARBs,LGUs)
is a major consideration. The identification and selection of the
ARCs follows DAR's criteria for prioritization.The primary objective
of the Project is poverty reduction. This will be pursued by supporting
the Government's strategy for equitable distribute of rural wealth
(agricultural land) and income through ARC development. More specific,
the project will increase the income of the farmers in the ARCs,
improve the quality of life in the ARCs by providing basic social
infrastructure, and enhance agricultural production and productivity
in a sustainable manner. The Project if fully implemented will (i)
provide rural infrastructure in response to a participatory identification
process; (ii) facilitate improved access by the ARBs and other farm
families in the selected ARCs to productive resources and markets;
(iii) expedite the survey and titling of public alienable and disposable
lands under the CARP; and (iv) provide support for the implementation
of the Project, including support to the CARP line agencies, LGUs,
and POs for delivery of resources and services that will enhances
the incomes of both beneficiaries and their organizations.
The
Project provides an integrated, complementary package of investment,
support services, and TA. This will enhance beneficiary and community
incomes by reducing input supply and marketing costs, and increasing
production and productivity, facilitated by better access to technology,
asset security (land survey and titling),and nonfarm income generation.
This will be accomplished as a result of infrastructure investments
(rural roads/bridges,potable water system and irrigation) complementary
development support services, credit and community development activities
(e.g., organizations of irrigators' associations, barangay water
and sanitation associations (BW/SAs), cooperatives and other POs).
Since the Project is demand-driven and participatory with an emphasis
on proactive LGU involvement and assisted self-reliance, capacity
building, institutional strengthening, and training for stakeholders
are included in the project. However, this will mainly be complementary
to support well-defined activities and investment, which are requested
and agreed to by the beneficiaries and other stakeholders. As s
consequence of the design and implementation arrangements, LGU capacity
building will be a significant spin-off effect on the Project. The
emphasis will be on local institution building and organizational
development rather than individual skill building.
|
|
| FAPsO
2002©, All Rights Reserved. |
|
|
|
|
|
|