|
NARRATIVE
SUMMARY |
OBJECTIVELY
VERIFIABLE INDICATOR (OVIs) |
MEANS
OF VERIFICATION |
ASSUMPTIONS |
| 0.0 To contribute to the
alleviation of rural poverty and economic disparities in Central
Mindanao |
|
|
|
| 1.0 Increased self-reliance,
living standards and quality of life for all households actively
farming in 50 selected Agrarian Reform Communities in Central
Mindanao |
1.1
Increase in the number of households with annual income levels
above the poverty threshold.
1.2 An increase in the proportion
of ARCs achieving an ALDA rating of 4 or above from 22% in
December 2001 to 80% by December 2007.
1.3 One third of all households
participating in income generating projects have reported
acquisition of production assets and improved housing conditions
1.4 Increase in the number of households with access to potable
water supplies within 10 minutes walk of the house.
1.5 Increase in the number of
POs sustaining operations using internally generated funds. |
Annual assessment
ALDA rating
Annual assessment
Sub-project completion reports
Organizational assessment of POs |
Self-reliance is sustained
and becomes the way of life of individual farmers and households
in the target ARCs. |
| 2.1 Improved capacity of
POs and LGUs to plan, implement, manage and maintain development
projects in the 50 target ARCs. |
2.1.1 Increase in
the number of POs preparing proposals for ARC development
projects, in collaboration with LGUs, but without assistance
from national line agencies.
2.1.2 POs in the target ARCs reporting an increase in number
of women in decision-making and leadership positions.
2.1.3 Increase in the number
of POs achieving an organizational maturity rating of greater
than 75% from 20% in December 2001 to 80% by December 2007.
2.1.4 Increase in the number
of POs able to sustain an operational surplus from managing
income-generating projects.
2.1.5 Increase in the number of POs able to sustain an annual
increase of 10% in share capital.
2.1.6 Increase in the number
of municipal LGUs that have implemented projects by administration
with a value of Php 1 million and above.
2.1.7 Operation & maintenance plans for all infrastructure
projects are being prepared, routinely budgeted for, and carried
out by LGUs/POs.
2.1.8 All irrigators' Associations have sufficient funds for
the operation and maintenance of communal irrigation schemes.
2.1.9 All barangay water and
sanitation association have sufficient funds for the operation
and maintenance of domestic water systems. |
LGU/PO records
PO records
PO assessments
PO assessments
PO assessments
LGU records
External monitoring reports
IA records
BAWASA records |
LGU officials do not dominate the ARC
planning process.
DAR continues to monitor
progress of and when necessary, provide support to PO development
efforts after EoP.
POs
able to sustain business operations and other services after
the ned of project assistance.
LGUs, IAs, and BAWASA and other POs continue to implement agreed
policies for the maintenance of infra facilities after project
completion. |
| 2.2 Rural infrastructure
better supports farmer productivity and welfare in the 50 target
ARcs |
2.2.1 Reduction in travel time from
ARCs to the nearest market centers following the rehabilitation
of feeder roads and/or the construction or repair of bridges.
2.2.2 Reduction in transport and hauling costs (passenger, products
farm inputs) in ARCs where road/bridge sub-projects are completed.
2.2.3 An increase in the area irrigated in ARCs covered by the
project.
2.2.4 An average 30% increase in annual production from areas
with new or rehabilitated irrigation systems.
2.2.5 Increase in average cropping intensity from 1 to 2 in
areas with newly constructed irrigation systems.
2.2.6 Increase in the number of households obtaining water from
communal tap stands rather than from creeks or shallow wells.
2.2.7 Increase in the number of farmers with access to post-harvest
facilities in the target ARCs |
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Barangay records
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
PO records |
Infrastructure is well designed and
constructed.
LGUs and POs undertake O&M
in accordance with the MOA.
User groups capable of sourcing sufficient funds for the O&M
of irrigation systems
Improved road access overcomes input supply and marketing constraints.
|
| 2.3 Agricultural production
and household income from non-agricultural enterprises in increased
in a sustainable way in the 50 target ARCs. |
2.3.1 Increase in
the number of households deriving sustainable income from
farming systems incorporating high value crops.
2.3.2 Increase in the number
of farming households deriving sustainable income from livestock
and poultry production.
2.3.3 Increase in the number of households deriving sustainable
income from fish production
2.3.4 Increase in the number
of households deriving sustainable income from fruit trees
and other perennial crops.
2.3.5 Increase in the area cultivated
through the use of farm machinery and draft animals introduced
by the project.
2.3.6 Increase in the number of households deriving sustainable
income from non-farm enterprises.
2.3.7 Increase in the volume of products processed using post-harvest
machinery in the ARCs.
2.3.8 Number of producers entering
into production and/or marketing contracts with processors/traders.
2.3.9 Number of farmers who adopted and sustained the use
of demonstrated technologies. |
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
Sub-project evaluation reports
POs records
Production/Marketing contracts
Records of the Office of Municipal Agricultural
Services. |
Increase in income resulting from grant
funded interventions are sustained.
Increased yields and marketable surpluses translate to increase
household income.
Competitive
marketing of agricultural commodities.
Farmers are allowed to cut and sell
timber.
POs continue to implement policies for
the operation and maintenance of machinery
Production and marketing contracts result in sustained increases
in revenue.
Demonstrated technologies result in increased income and remain
attractive to the farmers. |
| 2.4
Farming households in the target ARCs have better access to
the financial services provided by Government Financial Institutions
(GFIs) and Private Financial Institutions (PFIs). |
2.4.1 Increase in the number of PFIs
extending credit in the ARCs as a result of availing institutional
credit extended by the people's credit and finance corporation
(PCFC)
2.4.2 Increase in the number of households availing of credit
from the Land bank of the Philippines (LBP)
2.4.3 Increase in the number of Cooperatives availing of credit
from Land Bank of the Philippines (LBP).
2.4.4 Increase in the number of Cooperatives satisfying the
Credit Accreditation Criteria (CAC) of LBP.
2.4.5 Reduction in the number of cooperative with past due loans
with LBP. |
PFI records; PCFC records
PFI records.
LBP and Crop records
LBP abd Coop records
Credit Impact
Assessments
LBP and Coop records |
PFIs assisted by the project continue
to extend the same level and intensity of services to ARC residents
after EoP.
Cooperatives continue to extend
credit to their member under the same terms and conditions after
EoP.
GFI (LBP) continues to extend the same level and intensity of
services to the ARC cooperatives even after EoP. |
