view printer friendly version 
ARISP II LOGICAL FRAMEWORK
 
DESCRIPTIVE SUMMARY
OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE INDICATORS
MEANS OF VERIFICATION
ASSUMPTIONS/RISKS

GOAL:
Income increased


20% increase over baseline survey data estimated in constant prices 3 years after project completion

  • Baseline survey data
  • Impact Assessment Studies
  • NSO statistical reports & publications
  • Philippine Statistical Yearbook
  • Philippine Income & Expenditure survey

  • Sustained economic activities in the project areas
  • Prices of rice, corn and other farm products remain stable

Purposes:
1. Productivity Increased


  • Increased cropping intensity to 200% in year 2009
  • Increased farm productivity from 3.15 tons/ha to 5 tons/ha in year 2009
  • Increased production of palay, corn & other selected crops
  • Reduced maintenance cost of irrigation canals of rehabilitated irrigated facilities
  • Sustained high level collection of irrigation service fees
  • Lowered transport cost of goods and people by 38%
  • Lowered hauling cost of farm produce by 50%
  • Decreased travel time from ARC to economic centers and vice-versa by 46%
  • Increased number and types of vehicles using the FMRs for ARCs with rehabilitated FMRs
  • Increased number of transport-related services and businesses generated
  • Reduced incidence of water-borne and water-related diseases
  • Reduced time for fetching water
  • Increased household economic activities
  • Decreased losses from spoilage of farm produce
  • Increased in prices of agricultural produce
  • Increase in income of cooperatives

  • Project M&E reports
  • Benefits Monitoring Data Sheet
  • Benefit Evaluation Studies
  • Project Mid-Term review
    PAGASA meteorogical reports
  • CPI of farm inputs
  • LGU budgets for repair and maintenance of local infrastructure & extension services
  • Surveys on willingness of communities to participate in project activities

  • Farm inputs (e.g., HYV, fertilizers, chemicals) are made available to farmer-beneficiaries at affordable prices
  • Beneficiaries are willing to try new technologies
  • Credit requirements of farmers are provided either by the cooperatives or by other financing institutions
  • Sustained support of LGUs to the project, particularly in the repair and maintenance of farm-to-market roads, extension services, and in the planning and maintenance of rural water supply projects
  • Micro-enterprises and small livelihood projects identified by beneficiaries get the necessary funding
  • Community members are willing to participate in organizations involved in the project
2. ARCs transformed into viable, organized, self-reliant, socially prepared, and technically capable communities
  • Increased capital build-up funds generated
  • Increased amount of savings mobilized
  • High collection efficiency of loans and/or fees from members and/or users of facilities
  • High level of debt repayment by cooperatives, irrigators associations, and rural water users associations
  • Enhanced management and technical skills of officers and members of cooperatives, irrigators associations, and rural water users associations in the areas of leadership, resource mobilization, financial capability, credit management, and organization
  • Improved efficiency in the operation and maintenance of infrastructure support facilities
  • Increased level of application of technical know-how from extension services and demonstration farms
  • Enhanced capability of selected LGU staff in planning, implementation and maintenance of RWS projects
   

OUTPUTS:

1. Infrastructure projects implemented

 

1. Communal Irrigation

**1.1 130 irrigation systems constructed/rehabilitated covering 31,595.35 ha.
**1.2 2200% increae in cropping intesity year 2009
**1.3 Increase farm productivity from 3.1 tons/ha to 5 tons/ha in year 2009

 

  • NIA CARP-IC reports
  • PPMO MF-1 reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports

 

 

Assumptions:

  • GOP counterpart funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
  • Beneficiaries maintain irrigation facilities in good condition
  • Sustained support of LGUs to the maintenance of the irrigation facilities

Risks:

  • Natural calamities/ disasters occur in project areas
  • Peace and order problems
 

2.Farm-to-Market Roads

**2.1 182 road projects constructed/rehabilitated covering 643.42 km
**2.2 Transport cost of goods and people reduced by 38%
**2.3 Hauling cost of farm produced reduced by 50%
**2.4 Travel time shortened by 46%
**2.5 Number and type of vehicles using FMR increased
**2.6 Number and type of trasport-related business generated

 

  • DPWH PMO-CLB/CARP reports
  • PPMO MF-1 reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation

 

Assumptions:

  • GOP counterpart funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
  • Sustained support of LGUs to the maintenance of the road facilities

Risks:

  • Natural calamities/ disasters occur in project areas
  • Peace and order problems
 

3. Postharvest Facilities

**3.1 Postharvest losses reduced by 5%
**
3.2 66 warehouses constructed with capacity of 87,250 cavans
**
3.3 66 solar dryers constructed with capacity of 19,267 sqm
**3.4 Prices of agricultural produce increased
**
3.5 Income of cooperative increased

 

  • NIA CARP-IC reports
  • PPMO MF-1 reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports

 

 

Assumptions:

  • GOP counterpart funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
  • Sustained support of LGUs to the maintenance of the postharvest facilities

Risks:

  • Natural calamities/ disasters occur in project areas
  • Peace and order problems
 

4. Potable Rural Water Supply Systems

**4.1 Households with access to potable water increased by 18.029
** 4.2 time for fetching water reduced
**4.3 83 units of levels I & II water supply facilities constructed/rehabilitated

 

  • LGU reports
  • PPMO MF-1 reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports

 

 

Assumptions:

  • GOP counterpart funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
  • Beneficiaries maintain irrigation facilities in good condition
  • Sustained support of LGUs to the maintenance of the RWS facilities

Risks:

  • Natural calamities/ disasters occur in project areas
  • Peace and order problems
2. Institutional Development Projects implemented

1. Irrigators Asociations

**1.1 161 IAs/Gs organized / strengthened
**1.2 Level of irrigation service fee collection increased
**1.3 5,080 farmers trained on Basic Leadership

**1.4 6,207 farmers trained on Financial Management
**1.5 4,099 farmers trained on Systems Management

 

  • NIA CARP-IC reports
  • IDC Quarterly Performance Reports
  • Ocular Inspection Reports
  • Third party evaluation reports

 

Assumptions:
  • Beneficiaries are willing to try new technologies
  • IA members are willing to pay ISF regularly and religioudly
  • IA members are willing to comply with the organization's rules and policies
 

2. Farmers Cooperatives / Federations

**2.1 146 cooperatives assisted
**2.2 Capital build-up increased by 36%
**2.3 Savings mobilization increased by 63%
**2.4 Membership increased by 56%
**2.5 Debt repayment level increased
**2.6 Organizational maturity (Cooperative Organizational Capacity Index) of 146 cooperatives increased by average of 2 steps
**2.7 Credit readiness of 146 cooperatives attained
**2.8 Farmers trained on Financial Management
**2.9 Farmers trained on Operation and Management of Farm Enterprise
**2.10 Farmers trained on Cooperative Management and Leadership Skills Development


  • DAP Quarterly Cooperative Status Reports
  • IDC Quarterly Performance Reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports
  • Focused group discussions

 


Assumptions:

  • ARC members are willing to join the cooperative
  • Community members are willing to support and participate in the cooperative's projects and businesses
 
3. Rural Water Users Associations

**3.1 78 RWUAs organized/ assisted
**3.2 78 RWUAs trained on operation and maintenance of RWS system


  • IDC Quarterly Performance Reports
  • LGU reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports
 
  4. Agricultural Support Development

**
4.1 150 demonstration farms eastablished
**4.2 Demonstration farm replicated
**4.3 Harvest recovery increased by 15%
**4.4 Alternate varieities high value crops introduced
**4.5 Alternative farming systems introduced
**4.6 122 cooperatives trained on post-harvest technologies
**4.7 4,500 farmer-scientists trained on rice-based technology and facilitation skills
**4.8 4,500 farmer-scientists/trainors accredited with TESDA
**4.9 5,400 learning fields established
**4.10 Marketing linkages for 122 cooperatives established **4.11 122 cooperatives linked to microfinance institutions



  • IDC Quarterly Performance Reports
  • Agri-dev't monitoring reports
  • LGU reports
  • Ocular inspection reports
  • Third party evaluation reports
  • Focused group discussions
 

Activities:

1. Infrastructure Components

**1.1 Construction of communal irrigation projects (CIP)
**1.2 Rehabilitation of communal irrigation systems (CIS)
**1.3 Construction/rehabilitation of farm-to-market roads (FMR)
**1.4 Construction of post-harvest facilities (PHF)
**1.5 Construction of potable rural water supply (RWS) systems
     
2. Institutional Development

**2.1 Formation and registration of new organizations
**2.2 Strengthening of farmers organizations
**2.3 Training of farmers
**2.4 Capacitating of farmer-leaders
**2.5 Strengthening of Local Government Units (LGUs)
**2.6 Establishment of demonstration farms
     

 

 

 


FAPsO 2002©, All Rights Reserved.
ARISP II Logical Framework
Foreign-Assisted Projects Office.™
Copyright © 2002 - All Rights Reserved.