| DESCRIPTIVE
SUMMARY |
OBJECTIVELY
VERIFIABLE INDICATORS |
MEANS
OF VERIFICATION |
ASSUMPTIONS/RISKS |
GOAL:
Income increased |
20% increase over baseline survey data estimated in constant
prices 3 years after project completion |
- Baseline survey data
-
Impact Assessment
Studies
-
NSO statistical
reports & publications
-
Philippine Statistical
Yearbook
-
Philippine Income
& Expenditure survey
|
-
Sustained economic
activities in the project areas
-
Prices of rice,
corn and other farm products remain stable
|
Purposes:
1. Productivity Increased
|
-
Increased cropping
intensity to 200% in year 2009
-
Increased farm productivity
from 3.15 tons/ha to 5 tons/ha in year 2009
-
Increased production
of palay, corn & other selected crops
-
Reduced maintenance
cost of irrigation canals of rehabilitated irrigated facilities
-
Sustained high level
collection of irrigation service fees
-
Lowered transport
cost of goods and people by 38%
-
Lowered hauling
cost of farm produce by 50%
-
Decreased travel
time from ARC to economic centers and vice-versa by 46%
-
Increased number
and types of vehicles using the FMRs for ARCs with rehabilitated
FMRs
-
Increased number
of transport-related services and businesses generated
-
Reduced incidence
of water-borne and water-related diseases
-
Reduced time for
fetching water
-
Increased household
economic activities
-
Decreased losses
from spoilage of farm produce
-
Increased in prices
of agricultural produce
-
Increase in income
of cooperatives
|
-
Project M&E
reports
-
Benefits Monitoring
Data Sheet
-
Benefit Evaluation
Studies
-
Project Mid-Term
review
PAGASA meteorogical
reports
-
CPI of farm inputs
-
LGU budgets for
repair and maintenance of local infrastructure & extension
services
-
Surveys on willingness
of communities to participate in project activities
|
- Farm inputs (e.g., HYV, fertilizers,
chemicals) are made available to farmer-beneficiaries at
affordable prices
-
Beneficiaries are
willing to try new technologies
-
Credit requirements
of farmers are provided either by the cooperatives or
by other financing institutions
-
Sustained support
of LGUs to the project, particularly in the repair and
maintenance of farm-to-market roads, extension services,
and in the planning and maintenance of rural water supply
projects
-
Micro-enterprises
and small livelihood projects identified by beneficiaries
get the necessary funding
-
Community members
are willing to participate in organizations involved in
the project
|
| 2. ARCs transformed into
viable, organized, self-reliant, socially prepared, and technically
capable communities |
-
Increased capital
build-up funds generated
-
Increased amount
of savings mobilized
-
High collection
efficiency of loans and/or fees from members and/or users
of facilities
-
High level of debt
repayment by cooperatives, irrigators associations, and
rural water users associations
-
Enhanced management
and technical skills of officers and members of cooperatives,
irrigators associations, and rural water users associations
in the areas of leadership, resource mobilization, financial
capability, credit management, and organization
-
Improved efficiency
in the operation and maintenance of infrastructure support
facilities
-
Increased level
of application of technical know-how from extension services
and demonstration farms
-
Enhanced capability
of selected LGU staff in planning, implementation and
maintenance of RWS projects
|
|
|
OUTPUTS:
1. Infrastructure projects implemented |
1. Communal Irrigation
**1.1
130 irrigation systems constructed/rehabilitated covering
31,595.35 ha.
**1.2
2200% increae in cropping intesity year 2009
**1.3
Increase farm productivity from 3.1 tons/ha to 5 tons/ha in
year 2009 |
|
Assumptions:
-
GOP counterpart
funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
-
Beneficiaries maintain
irrigation facilities in good condition
-
Sustained support
of LGUs to the maintenance of the irrigation facilities
Risks:
|
| |
2.Farm-to-Market Roads
**2.1
182 road projects constructed/rehabilitated covering 643.42
km
**2.2
Transport cost of goods and people reduced by 38%
**2.3
Hauling cost of farm produced reduced by 50%
**2.4
Travel time shortened by 46%
**2.5
Number and type of vehicles using FMR increased
**2.6
Number and type of trasport-related business generated
|
|
Assumptions:
Risks:
|
| |
3. Postharvest Facilities
**3.1
Postharvest losses reduced by 5%
**3.2 66
warehouses constructed with capacity of 87,250 cavans
**3.3 66
solar dryers constructed with capacity of 19,267 sqm
**3.4
Prices of agricultural produce increased
**3.5 Income
of cooperative increased |
|
Assumptions:
Risks:
|
| |
4. Potable Rural Water Supply Systems
**4.1
Households with access to potable water increased by 18.029
** 4.2
time for fetching water reduced
**4.3
83 units of levels I & II water supply facilities constructed/rehabilitated
|
|
Assumptions:
-
GOP counterpart
funds & loan proceeds are made available as scheduled
-
Beneficiaries maintain
irrigation facilities in good condition
-
Sustained support
of LGUs to the maintenance of the RWS facilities
Risks:
|
| 2. Institutional Development
Projects implemented |
1. Irrigators Asociations
**1.1
161 IAs/Gs organized / strengthened
**1.2
Level of irrigation service fee collection increased
**1.3
5,080 farmers trained on Basic Leadership **1.4
6,207 farmers trained on Financial Management
**1.5
4,099 farmers trained on Systems Management |
-
NIA CARP-IC reports
-
IDC Quarterly Performance
Reports
-
Ocular Inspection
Reports
-
Third party evaluation
reports
|
Assumptions:
-
Beneficiaries
are willing to try new technologies
-
IA members are
willing to pay ISF regularly and religioudly
-
IA members are
willing to comply with the organization's rules and
policies
|
| |
2. Farmers Cooperatives
/ Federations
**2.1
146 cooperatives assisted
**2.2
Capital build-up increased by 36%
**2.3
Savings mobilization increased by 63%
**2.4
Membership increased by 56%
**2.5
Debt repayment level increased
**2.6
Organizational maturity (Cooperative Organizational Capacity
Index) of 146 cooperatives increased by average of 2 steps
**2.7
Credit readiness of 146 cooperatives attained
**2.8 Farmers trained on Financial
Management
**2.9
Farmers trained on Operation and Management of Farm Enterprise
**2.10
Farmers trained on Cooperative Management and Leadership Skills
Development |
-
DAP Quarterly Cooperative
Status Reports
-
IDC Quarterly Performance
Reports
-
Ocular inspection
reports
-
Third party evaluation
reports
-
Focused group discussions
|
Assumptions:
|
| |
3. Rural Water Users
Associations
**3.1
78 RWUAs organized/ assisted
**3.2
78 RWUAs trained on operation and maintenance of RWS system |
-
IDC Quarterly Performance
Reports
- LGU reports
-
Ocular inspection
reports
-
Third party evaluation
reports
|
|
| |
4. Agricultural Support Development
**4.1 150
demonstration farms eastablished
**4.2
Demonstration farm replicated
**4.3
Harvest recovery increased by 15%
**4.4
Alternate varieities high value crops introduced
**4.5
Alternative farming systems introduced
**4.6
122 cooperatives trained on post-harvest technologies
**4.7
4,500 farmer-scientists trained on rice-based technology and
facilitation skills
**4.8
4,500 farmer-scientists/trainors accredited with TESDA
**4.9
5,400 learning fields established
**4.10
Marketing linkages for 122 cooperatives established **4.11
122 cooperatives linked to microfinance institutions |
-
IDC Quarterly Performance
Reports
-
Agri-dev't monitoring
reports
-
LGU reports
-
Ocular inspection
reports
-
Third party evaluation
reports
-
Focused group discussions
|
|
| Activities:
1. Infrastructure Components
**1.1
Construction of communal irrigation projects (CIP)
**1.2
Rehabilitation
of communal irrigation systems (CIS)
**1.3
Construction/rehabilitation
of farm-to-market roads (FMR)
**1.4
Construction of post-harvest facilities (PHF)
**1.5
Construction of potable rural water
supply (RWS) systems |
|
|
|
2. Institutional Development
**2.1
Formation and registration of
new organizations
**2.2
Strengthening of farmers organizations
**2.3
Training of farmers
**2.4
Capacitating of farmer-leaders
**2.5
Strengthening of Local Government
Units (LGUs)
**2.6
Establishment of demonstration
farms |
|
|
|