ARCDP Logical Framework

THE ARCDP PROJECT LOGICAL FRAMEWORK

NARRATIVE SUMMARY	OBJECTIVELY VERIFIABLE INDICATORS	MEANS OF VERIFICATION	ASSUMPTIONS
GOAL/IMPACT LEVEL Rural poverty decreased; quality of life of target beneficiaries improved	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS By year 2000, 20% increase in real net income; 40% increase by year 2002	Biennial Impact Assessment (main MOV) FAO/TSARRD surveys DAR database IARDS study Other socio-economic studies	Macro economic situation stable GOP continues to support agrarian reform program through appropriate policies
PURPOSE/OUTCOME LEVEL Farmers and other beneficiaries within target ARCs undertake economic activities to raise their incomes and sustain project gains and initiatives	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS By year 2000, 25% increase in crop intensification; 50% increase by year 2002 By year 2000, quality of infra maintenance raised to Grade Level A By year 2002 transport cost reduced by 40% By Year 2000, business assets increase by $100,000; by $200,000 by year 2002 By year 2000, 10% average increase in OMA rating; 20% by year 2002	Biennial Outcome Assessment (main MOV) FAO/TSARRD surveys DAR database IARDS study ALDA/OMA results Initial Gains from Project Interventions	All target outputs generated in planned quantities and on Time; Peace and order problems manageable No unusually adverse weather conditions No undue political interventions
OUTPUT LEVEL 1. CD/TA Component – Strengthened capabilities of ARCs to actively participate in planning, managing, and sustaining community development	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS By year 2002, 226 Bgys w/in 102 ARCs with BDC-endorsed Barangay Development Plans By year 2002, 226 Barangay Implementing Teams operational By year 2002, 226 Bgys w/ infra Operations and Maintenance Groups operational By year 2002, 2,777 CB projects implemented By year 2002, 237 POs strengthened	Annual Performance Assessment (main MOV) Project Implementation Highlights Process Documentation – highlights of issues only Site Visits Progress Reports	All planned inputs provided on time No. & quality of proj. staff at all levelsmaintained
2. RI Component – Community identified and approved infra support requirements implemented and system for operation and maintenance installed	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS By year 2002, 810 kilometers of road constructed/rehab’d By year 2002, 2,717 linear meters of bridges constructed By year 2002, 10,000 hectares of land irrigated through irrigation system construction/rehab’n By year 2002, 100 units of potable water system installed By year 2002, 80 units of multi-purpose centers constructed	Annual Performance Assessment (main MOV) Project Implementation Highlights Site Visits Progress Report	All planned inputs provided on timeSustained LGU cooperation LGU engineers, counterpart funds, and other inputs provided on time No. and quality of staff at all levels maintained No undue political intervention
3. AED Component – ARCs productivity improved in terms of introducing appropriate technologies and fund accessing for viable enterprises	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS By year 2002, 20% of about 40,000 beneficiaries engaged in enterprise activities (off- and non-farm) By year 2002, 258 grant proposals, 335 loan proposals, 220 self help proposals approved By year 2002, 754 demo farms establishedØ At least 50% trained farmers have adopted appropriate technology by year 2002 Increase in crop yield by an average of 10% based on 1996 provincial average by year 2002 Average increase in farm effective areas by 10% by 2002 and 20% by 2004	Annual Performance Assessment (main MOV) Project Implementation Highlights Process Documentation Site VisitsProgress Report	All planned inputs provided on time No major tenurial issues Credit available to farmers’ enterprises Favorable market for farmers’ products Availability of support services from LGUs, DA, and other agencies- No and quality of staff at all levels maintained
INPUT LEVEL Loan Counterpart	PERFORMANCE/RESULTS INDICATORS RI $37.7 M Project Management $3.4 M Unallocated $8.9 M Total $50.0 M Total P1,721.7 M CD/TA P165.9 M RI P147.3 M AED P720.0 M Project Management P38.5 M	Annual Performance Assessment (main MOV) Manual of Operations Project Implementation Highlights Financial Reports Audit Reports	World Bank and GOP release funds on time No and quality of proj staff at all levels maintained Exchange rate remains stable up to yr. 2002 Non-programmable portion of counterpart continue to be provided by the LGU/ARCs Additional peso proceeds from loan resulting from devaluation approved by ICC and released by DBM Exchange rate at time of loan = P26.00 /$